Your systematic second pair of eyes
- Extracts and classifies tender requirements
- Maps clauses to your bid evidence
- Flags gaps and inconsistencies before submission
Example bid review report
The risk before submission
Disqualification traps
One missed clause or certificate can disqualify you before merit evaluation.
Contradictions across volumes
Technical claims drift between annexes and appendices. They are easy to miss under deadline pressure.
Last-minute approvals
Legal, QA, and engineering need a fast, clear view of what's missing.
Clear review trail
Keep a structured record of requirement checks, open issues, and supporting evidence before submission.
From the ITT to the bid you send
Requirements, then the clarifications you send, then the finished bid checked against the same list.
Day 1
Tender Review
The package arrives. We extract the requirements, missing documents, and conflicts, each cited to its page, so you start from a list you can work from.
Learn moreDuring bidding
Clarifications
Flag what is unclear and what you cannot meet as written. Send TQs and deviations from the same list; answers fold back in so nothing is rebuilt by hand.
Learn moreBefore submission
Bid Review
Check the finished bid against every requirement. We mark covered, mismatch, missing, or extra while there is still time to fix it.
Learn moreA systematic bid review
Your bid reviewed against the specific requirements and technical specifications defined in your ITT package. Issues the AI aims to find include:
Evidence & Documentation Gaps
Missing evidence or expired certificates requested by the buyer.
Internal Contradictions
Claims that conflict across documents.
Technical Mismatches
Deviations from the buyer's stated technical specifications.
Incomplete Responses
Missing or inadequately addressed information required by the ITT.
Conflicts in the ITT
Requirements that contradict each other across volumes, annexes, or amendments.
Ambiguities in the ITT
Unclear scope, undefined terms, or obligations open to competing readings.
Dangerous commercial clauses
Terms that affect price, liability, or schedule in the ITT.
Explanations & Sources
Understand why AI flagged it.
Findings include explanations and sources.
Beginning to end
Coverage across the tender
Tenders change along the way. Amendments and clarifications are supported, so later changes can be included in the review.
Deliverables
Midpilot's AI system delivers two outputs to help accelerate bid cycles and mitigate risk:
- An Excel review trail with clause-by-clause findings and source links to your documents.
- A PDF report with a summary of gaps, contradictions, and potential risks for your review.
Built by AI experts who understand risk
Philip Hodne, MSc
LinkedInCEO
Formerly at DNV, where he helped build the maritime industry's largest data platform and published AI research.
Thomas Irgens, MSc
LinkedInCTO
Formerly at NBIM and IBM, developing AI solutions to accelerate workflows and enterprise performance.