Your systematic second pair of eyes
- Extracts and classifies tender requirements
- Maps each clause to your bid evidence
- Flags gaps and inconsistencies before submission
Example adherence review report
The risk before submission
Disqualification traps
One missed clause or certificate can disqualify you before merit evaluation.
Contradictions across volumes
Technical claims drift between annexes and appendices — easy to miss under deadline pressure.
Last-minute approvals
Legal, QA, and engineering need a fast, clear view of what's missing.
Defensibility
Document your submission's alignment with requirements — win or lose.
Improve your bid from ITT to submission
Requirement mapping
Scan the entire tender package in minutes, converting messy ITTs into requirements.
Bid Writer
Coming SoonLet AI help you draft high-quality responses to tender requirements.
Bid Review
Our AI cross-references your draft against the ITT to help identify potential adherence gaps.
A systematic adherence check
Your bid cross-checked against the specific requirements and technical specifications defined in your ITT/RFP package. Issues highlighted include:
Evidence & Documentation Gaps
Missing evidence or expired certificates requested by the buyer.
Internal Contradictions
Claims that conflict across documents.
Technical Mismatches
Deviations from the buyer's stated technical specifications.
Incomplete Responses
Missing or inadequately addressed information required by the ITT.
Explanations & Sources
See exactly why AI flagged it.
Every finding includes explanations and sources.
Deliverables
Two outputs to fix issues before the deadline:
- An Excel adherence matrix with clause-by-clause findings and source links to your documents.
- A PDF adherence review report with a must-fix summary and risk flags for fast legal/QA sign-off.
