Bid Review

See what the bid never answered.

Midpilot's AI checks the finished bid against the requirements extracted from the tender. Each item is marked covered, mismatch, missing, or extra, with a citation in both documents.

Input

The ITT requirements list plus the bid you intend to submit.

Deliverable

A comparison your team can filter: what matches, what differs, what is missing, and what was added.

Where we stop

We flag and cite. We do not decide exceptions, and we do not submit the bid.

A bid adherence review of the finished offer.

Counts first: what aligns, what is incomplete, and where the bid leaves a gap. Then the flagged rows, each cited to the ITT.

Midpilot

Bid Adherence Review

Skarven Offshore Wind Farm · Nordhavn Energy · with Addendum 1

Prepared 12 Sep 2026. This is decision support only. It is not legal, technical, or commercial advice. The bid call stays with the team.

1. Executive Summary

Of 11 requirements assessed from the ITT and the bid: 7 aligned (64%), 0 with incomplete evidence (0%), 4 with a potential gap (36%).

Requirements Assessed

11

Aligned

7

Partially Aligned

0

Potential Gap

4

Evidence Coverage

740

Aligned

Partial

Potential Gap

Distribution

Aligned (7) · Potential Gap (4)

Coverage by Discipline
DisciplineTotalPotential GapsCoverage %
Submission30100%
Technical / Plant4250%
Quality2150%
Commercial10100%
Site / Logistics110%

2. Identified Gaps for Review

These rows have a gap between the ITT and the bid. Open a line for the quote and the assessment. The team still decides the response.

AI-generated output. Human review required.The team retains the bid call.

Aligned

The bid meets the numbered row as written.

Potential Gap

No matching evidence, or the offer differs from the ITT. The team still decides the response.

Coverage by discipline

Gaps cluster by plant, quality, commercial, and site so review can be assigned.

Issue / Assessment

A short call on the row, cited back to the ITT quote and the bid.

Bring the bid you are about to send.

We will run it against the ITT and show what is covered, what differs, and what never got answered. Each finding is cited to both documents.