Bid Review
Midpilot's AI checks the finished bid against the requirements extracted from the tender. Each item is marked covered, mismatch, missing, or extra, with a citation in both documents.
Input
The ITT requirements list plus the bid you intend to submit.
Deliverable
A comparison your team can filter: what matches, what differs, what is missing, and what was added.
Where we stop
We flag and cite. We do not decide exceptions, and we do not submit the bid.
Counts first: what aligns, what is incomplete, and where the bid leaves a gap. Then the flagged rows, each cited to the ITT.
Midpilot
Lynx Harbour Converter Station · North Grid Transmission · with Addendum 1
Prepared 12 Sep 2026. Decision-support only — not legal, technical, or commercial advice. The bid call stays with the team.
Of 11 requirements assessed from the ITT and the bid: 7 aligned (64%), 0 with incomplete evidence (0%), 4 with a potential gap (36%).
Requirements Assessed
11
Aligned
7
Partially Aligned
0
Potential Gap
4
Evidence Coverage
Aligned
Partial
Potential Gap
Distribution
Aligned (7)
Aligned (7) · Potential Gap (4)
Potential Gap (4)
| Discipline | Total | Potential Gaps | Coverage % |
|---|---|---|---|
| Submission | 3 | 0 | 100% |
| Technical / Plant | 4 | 2 | 50% |
| Quality | 2 | 1 | 50% |
| Commercial | 1 | 0 | 100% |
| Site / Logistics | 1 | 1 | 0% |
These rows have a gap between the ITT and the bid. Open a line for the quote and the assessment — the team still decides the response.
AI-generated output. Human review required.The team retains the bid call.
Aligned
The bid meets the numbered row as written.
Potential Gap
No matching evidence, or the offer differs from the ITT. The team still decides the response.
Coverage by discipline
Where the gaps cluster — plant, quality, commercial, site — so review can be assigned.
Issue / Assessment
A short call on the row, cited back to the ITT quote and the bid.